JAY JG said:
From: "Tony Sidaway" minorityreport@bluebottle.com
Try again.
How about this [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&target=H... Contribution list which includes 35 identical "keep" votes in 30 minutes; another example of careful consideration of each school article, followed by lined-up Firefox tabs and rapid-fire voting? And don't forget, these articles are in different locations and on different subpages of the VfD page; these people are clearly going through one of the two "Schoolwatch" pages which have been set up.
Absolutely, no question of it, they're using Schoolwatch. This guy's edits are sometimes stretched out, sometimes close together, just like mine. I have no reason to believe that he's not doing things exactly as I do, even down to gawping at cheerleader.
He's also responding to comments. This is no robotic poster, but a person discussing and voting on deletion listings.
He also seems to edit a fair bit on school-related articles. Isn't he entitled to input on school deletion listings?
And this guy has been editing Wikipedia as long as I have and, like the other person you gave as an example of an "organised inclusionist", he didn't vote on a schools VfD until Tuesday of this week--clearly in response to Neutrality's listing of more than 50 schools for deletion.
I'm beginning to detect a common thread here. Another dragon tooth.
Please do list more of these alleged "organised inclusionists". They're proving most entertaining!