On 6/8/06, Steve Bennett stevagewp@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/8/06, Anthony DiPierro wikilegal@inbox.org wrote:
What's the difference between the system that exists now and the system that existed before, other than the fact that it's harder to maintain? The proposed pages are still publically visible and editable - in fact they're *more* publically visible. Why aren't the people who were overworked with deleting stuff from the article namespace now overworked with deleting stuff from AFC?
Why bother deleting anything from AfC? my understanding of the process was that the AfC for a given day hangs around for a few days to see if anyone can find anything redeeming, then the whole lot is flushed down the plughole. If we're preserving archives of AfC, then we're probably doing somethnig wrong.
Steve
Last time I checked "archives" of AfC were being kept.
Anthony