On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 11:49 PM, < jayjg99@gmail.com > wrote:
Second, with respect to SlimVirgin and Lar. Lar pretty much has his hands tied. It would certainly be a breach of the privacy policy to discuss the results of the check, and it would be an ethical violation (if not a privacy violation) to discuss the reason for the check. So his hands are tied; SlimVirgin can slag off on him publicly and he can't defend himself. That's pretty low, and this is maybe the third time it has happened. (Once before on checkuser-L and once at [[Wikipedia talk:Checkuser]].) So I think it would be best for all concerned, if Slim believes that Lar is not trustworthy, that she make a formal request to Arbcom to consider the matter, and then keep it off the wiki.
You left out the issue of Lar informing his wife, another Wikipedia editor, of the results of the checks.
There are many other things I left out as well, and this is certainly not the forum to discuss the matter.
I'm pretty sure the on-wiki thread had been allowed to die out until it was resurrected here. I think the best thing for all concerned is to stop talking about this on the public mailing list. The affected parties have two routes of complaint open to them, and it's really time to file a formal complaint or to drop the matter.
Thatcher