Robert mentioned:
fabricating Jewish beliefs, and then attacking Jews for these non-existent beliefs
Well, that kind of stuff certainly has no place in an encyclopedia article. It's easy to win an argument by putting words in your opponent's mouth.
But "standing up" to another Wikipedian might not be as useful as REFRAMING their arguments as POV. Just locate the source of the "offending" statement and mention in the article that White Supremacists or Neo-Nazis or Holocaust Deniers believe (this or that). Why kick up such a fuss?
Sorry I didn't plow through the "full text", but that will take more time than I have. Sometimes snipping away is the best strategy, like doctors debriding dead flesh from a wound.
Sincerely,
Ed Poor