Dan Drake wrote
<snip> I wonder if a consensus might be possible on this: Any article that's showing a dispute-header is presumed to be a poor advertisement for the high quality of Wikipedia and must not be Featured until the problem is solved.
That means anyone can effectively 'censor' articles by disputing their neutrality, for whatever reason.
Would it be too dangerous if some level-headed people were authorized to remove such an article immediately from the list without waiting for the complete process at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates ?
Who decides who is level-headed, here? Yes, too 'dangerous'.
Charles