Jimmy has added a link to the answers.com Wikipedia edition to the [[Wikipedia:Tools]] page:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Tools&diff=48023818&...
Since Jimmy has also said that the decision to list this tool, and where to list it, should be an editorial decision, I have begun an editorial discussion on
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Tools#Answers.com_tool
about whether it is wise to effectively advertise this tool, which is at the heart of Answers.com's software patents lawsuit against Babylon Software. You can find more information about Answers.com's lawsuit in their press release on the matter:
http://www.answers.com/main/ir/press03082006.jsp
I have also pointed out the issue on foundation-l and asked the Wikimedia Board to re-evaluate the Answers.com deal in light of the software patents lawsuit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2006-March/006356.html
The Board has not responded to this request. Again, failing any comment to the contrary, I will assume that the decision whether to list this tool on [[Wikipedia:Tools]] and/or highlight it in other forms is up to the community. I personally object to it unless the software patent lawsuit is mentioned on the page in an NPOV manner.
Erik