Well, you're allowed to edit your talk page (at least, at first). Is the AN/I page a grey area?
Nope. If you're blocked, you're not allowed to edit it. You can always e-mail one of the 1000 admins (or, indeed, one of the 100,000 or more Wikipedia editors) and ask him or her to put something up there.
Jay.
Oh Jay, you are the libram of Wikipedia's rules.
I observed this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Circumcision#Sexual_effects
So, we have a "reliable source", stating there would be no evidence regarding X. That statement is provably wrong since we find plenty of evidence for (and against) X just searching the journals. They simply didn't do their homework.
But now, you conclude that we cannot in any way point out that the statement is provably wrong? Not even remove it altoghether to avoid confusion? You insist on keeping the provably wrong statement there, knowing, that it is indeed provably wrong?
You insist to have something, that is verifiably, and provably, wrong, in Wikipedia, and you object to someone changing it?
Because its not against the rules to write something wrong in an article, even when knowing that it is verifiably and provably wrong, as long as you can find a source that says it?
I guess when someone "knows the rules" as good as you do, you can pull off stuff like that.