Bryan Derksen wrote:
Do you know if this non-logged-in user even knows that such a thing as "edit summaries" exist, and can be viewed with that "history" link he might never have clicked on before?
If you put it right in the article, either inline or as a footnote, then that guarantees that not only will the current guy you're disputing see it but also all future editors who stumble across it and would otherwise think "hey, that's not what my map says. Stupid Wikipedia!"
Yes, he's rather well aware of how Wikipedia works.