On 30/05/07, jayjg jayjg99@gmail.com wrote:
On 5/30/07, Andrew Gray shimgray@gmail.com wrote:
A link to whichever attack site we're discussing? Pretty remarkable if one turns up. A link to something that someone might construe as an attack site in the future for their own bizzare purposes? As we have seen, sadly, not improbable...
I'm not sure what you're saying.
I'd say it was pretty blindingly obvious that he means that someone attempted to scour nielsenhayden.com from the encyclopedia claiming it was an "attack site", and that this behaviour is really not acceptable; and, from this, that policies or alleged policies that make this seem a good idea are to be regarded with deep suspicion.
- d.