On 5/13/06, Guy Chapman aka JzG guy.chapman@spamcop.net wrote:
On Fri, 12 May 2006 19:43:44 -0400, you wrote:
That edit says that "Templates that are divisive and inflammatory" are CSD candidates. The current version says "Templates designed for user pages that express personal beliefs, ideologies, ethical convictions, or viewpoints on controversial issues, or any other templates which are otherwise divisive or inflammatory."
Because some people have to be beaten vigorously with a cluebat before they realise that their userboxes are divisive - as far as some people are concerned an opinion which is shared by all "right-thinking" people can't possibly be divisive.
Guy (JzG)
The point is, those of you claiming that this CSD is an edict from above have so far provided no evidence that it actually is. In fact, after looking further, someone on that page made the claim that Jimbo has explicitly stated that it's *not* an edict from above.
Anthony