--- steve v vertigosteve@yahoo.com wrote:
The article did'nt have any real substance to respond to anyway, so why bother? I know, I know--care requires correctionality. Hmph.
Irony. The article was critical of Wikipedia for not being vetted by experts and thus not reliable. Yet it was written by a person with a PdD who made very obvious factual errors that have yet to be corrected.
I have yet to get a response from her, but I don't expect one either.
-- mav
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com