SlimVirgin has abusively sockpuppeted before - as Sweet Blue Water if my memory is correct - a sock which she tag teamed with on articles and used to vote twice in some instances. I don't think she's in a position to get self righteous that anyone would think she might be sockpuppeting again, particularly as she's never apologized or explained the SWB sock.
David
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 10:45 PM, Thatcher131 Wikipedia < thatcher131@gmail.com> wrote:
I suppose it depends on the circumstances. Hard to say more in public.
Thatcher
Jpgordon wrote
In what way is it an ethical violation to reveal the reason for a check?
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 7:17 PM, Thatcher131 Wikipedia < thatcher131 at gmail.com> wrote:
On 7/19/08, David Katz <dkatz2001 at gmail.com> wrote:
It certainly doesn't appear that SV was given this information so that
she
could block or report the person on whom the CheckUser was run.
Instead, it
appears that she was told so she could tip off the person.
You've misunderstood what happened. I was told -- told, not "tipped off" -- about the checkuser because I was one of the people Lar checked. That is allowed under the policy.
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l