On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 22:44:27 -0500, "The Mangoe" the.mangoe@gmail.com wrote:
Well, that's your opinion, but I don't think that's a reasonable way of treating the statistics. But the thing is, six could easily be none, if BADSITES could be allowed to die. The way to let it die is to quit removing the links and to enforce the consensus that they not be removed.
BADSITES *is* dead, ages ago.
You'll never prevent people removing, in good faith, content they find objectionable. Look at the incredible acrimony stirred up by the Jyllands-Posten cartoon article.
What you can do is minimise the disruption by having a clear guideline and following [[WP:BRD]] - the D part has been conspicuous by its absence in the tiny number of disputes we've had.
Guy (JzG)