"Thomas Dalton" thomas.dalton@gmail.com wrote in message news:a4359dff0905210715y374984dfgdc50e68a30de04e1@mail.gmail.com...
2009/5/21 Jay Litwyn brewhaha@freenet.edmonton.ab.ca:
"Thomas Dalton" thomas.dalton@gmail.com wrote in message news:a4359dff0905041400s344e381bl8129696714d09af5@mail.gmail.com...
2009/5/4 stevertigo stvrtg@gmail.com:
Dealing with an issue on [[Talk:Perfect crime]]:
Me: "...which is of course not to say that the concept of "perfect crime" is meaningless, just that it only has meaning outside of a religious view and within very narrow contexts like colloquial usage and crime novels. A paragraph on the religious point of view doesn't hurt the encyclopedia and in fact gives the article greater depth and illumination."
I'm sorry, what is your point? This isn't a good place to discuss individual articles, keep that on the talk pages. Did you have a general point you wanted to discuss?
That rule excludes me, so I do not like it. The name of the group is not "External Affairs".
It excludes you because you have been blocked. That means the community does not want your contributions, not that it wants them somewhere else.
I hav been placed on moderation for feeding a troll. Speak for yourself, Mister Dalton. You must realize by now that you can only imagine what other people think, and in the moment you wrote "community", you were speaking for other blocked users who might want to know that they can contribute, here, regarding things that are ON wikipedia, rather than having everybody concentrate on what is not. The name of the group is not "External Affairs".