On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 11:05 AM, WJhonson@aol.com wrote:
nawrich@gmail.com writes:
FT2 has repeated that the block on Eleemosynary will be lifted if he/she agrees not to repeat the real names of pseudonymous editors.
What further object do you hope to achieve?
To be an instrument in bringing a valued editor back into the project.
Your engagement and discussion here doesn't seem to be oriented towards that goal, however.
There are two ways to do that:
1. Convince Eleemosynary to abide by the behavior restrictions FT2 noted, which are existing policy and applicable to the situation as described.
2. Explain enough of the situation accurately that people can look into it themselves, determine if there was a policy or admin behavior violation involved, and work to convince either FT2 or the admin community to reverse that decision.
What you did was not applicable to 1 and not sufficient for 2, and now that I have enough information I doubt that 2 is appropriate as a solution anyways.