On 12/11/05, Tony Sidaway f.crdfa@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/10/05, MacGyverMagic/Mgm macgyvermagic@gmail.com wrote:
Why should 2 people be able to overthrow a bunch of others in case where there's nothing wrong with their judgement?
One person can do it. Why should "a bunch of others" *not* be wrong in their judgement?
You'd need a bloody good reasons for an undeletion.
Like getting it wrong.
But undeletions as well as deletions should be proofed and
checked by the community before they happen.
Seldom works like that. Anyone who thinks that AfD is the forum most conducive to assuming bad faith should spend a couple of days reading Deletion Review. We do have an undeletion policy, but deletion review is conducted in an atmosphere where any attempt to quote that undeletion policy on the page is repeatedly reverted.
I agree, DRV is making it quite hard to get valid stuff undeleted, but if one allows just two people to agree on stuff like this I expect a lot of deletion wars. Addressing people ignoring the need to undelete when new evidence is presented in DRV seems more useful to me. Have you got any particular case in mind?
Mgm