Just a problem to be advised of. I was advocating much the same position as the person who I replied to, and most people who objected to it objected for this reason.
The second point isn't that major. Feel free to disregard it. :)
Chris
On 4/14/05, Tom Haws hawstom@sprintmail.com wrote:
Chris Jenkinson wrote:
Actually, we were discussing this very issue on IRC earlier. The main problem we found with this was that it would be a new target for vandals - to recategorise various images into unrelated categories.
Please forgive me, but this sounds weak. Was this merely a problem to be advised of or a deal-breaker?
Also, when going through the filter to select categories that they do not wish to see, people might find it objectionable to have content like beheadings or sexual activity available for people to view. I'm assuming of course that all 'categories' of images like this would be on by default - also, this would only be practical if it were for registered users, of which the vast majority of visitors aren't
Can you explain this again? This went right over my head.
Tom