I have a suggestion if ever one doesn't mind...I have spoke to Mike off site and he told he will seriously try to be a good boy. I think that arb committee should at least grant mike Parole and if in certain amount of time he doesn't edit in good faith perma-block him. I seriously have faith in Mike as a person, and I have faith that the arb committee and jimbo could grant him some Clemency. Thank you
User:Plato
Guanaco guanaco@cox.net wrote: Matt Brown wrote:
I am troubled by User:Guanaco's behavior here.
He does have a valid point that banning Michael seems to not work. He only comes back with new accounts or edits via IP, and does the same thing. It may indeed be easier to "contain" him to a known account or two and then just pick up the pieces.
HOWEVER, I don't think it's Guanaco's place to unilaterally decide that this should be our new policy. He is still officially banned and bannable on sight. If we want to alter this decision, let's discuss it in a place of record (here, or on Wikipedia).
-Matt (User:Morven)
I am not unilaterally unblocking him, but I am not prohibited from doing so. My decision to unblock Michael's accounts is supported by both Danny and Theresa Knott and falls within the "in other appropriate cases" guideline for unblocking. The blocks do nothing to prevent him from logging out, creating a new account, and then editing a different page. He can be blocked on sight, but it is clear that he shouldn't.
--Guanaco
_______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Y! Messenger - Communicate in real time. Download now.