See 'icra.org' for an example - but the labels are divided into different categories, and each category has a set of 'definitions' which you can select
e.g. nudity - visible genitals, bare buttocks, exposed breasts, none of the above sexual material - erotica, erections/explicit sexual acts, explicit sexual language, visible sexual touching, obscured or implied sexual acts, passionate kissing, none of the above
the other categories - violence, potentially harmful activities etc. proceed on much the same lines
incidentally, the ICRA generator also has a tickbox for 'the material appears in an educational context' - which Wikipedia would probably qualify as
Cynical
geni wrote:
On 3/26/06, David Alexander Russell webmaster@davidarussell.co.uk wrote:
Yeah, I don't see why (for example) Wikipedia articles could not be 'tagged' with ICRA-style PICS labels. These are machine-readable metadata that give information on whether the article contains certain types of content e.g. profanity, nudity, substance abuse, and the 'severity' of that content (e.g. ranging from passionate kissing to close-up explicit sexual acts for the nudity category).
Please provide a titanium hardened defintion of these terms.
-- geni _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l