I would agree on that. It is OK with me to wait a few more months while editing on other articles and gain more experience. Please note that, none of my edits were out of acceptable limits. I took all my edits serious on Gulen talk page too, as you can easily see from quality of my edits. I believe this Wikipedia project can be improved further and I am ready and willing to offer my help. On the other hand, I canot accept your statements which imply that I am editing barely to support someone else. With my whole respect, that is not a kind and good statement. I am not a blind follower of someone and Dr. Gulerdem who is an adorable person, a gentleman with an unbelievably good mind did not asked me to back up him on that dispute. It is not something he can do, and it is not something I could agree on. He mainly introduced the project to me, in particular pointed out the Gulen article. I thought I can do something about it myself. I do not know why those people feel animosity towards Dr. Gulerdem (other than some ideological or religious hatred) but I think one should consider it as a chance for Wikipedia, if he still wants to continue on editing. Thank you for your recommendation and understanding. Ceyda Lacin
Looking this over, it seems clear that the account was started on Wikipedia to participate in the Fethullah G?len controversy (as over 50% of the edits are on that subject), but that the account holder is apparently honestly willing and interested in contributing to Wikipedia in other areas. Bringing new users to Wikipedia in order to sway the outcome of a controversy is justly frowned upon, however, on this evidence alone, I would recommend an unblock if, and only if, the account holder agrees to avoid the Fethullah G?len controversy for a period of time (at least a few months, and maybe a year).
Jesse Weinstein
_________________________________________________________________ Dont just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/