Amen. It'd be nice to see what we could do with built-in image editing software. Also, if this goes through, prepare for images of unrelated things popping up in random places (vandals; -shakes head-)
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 12:09 PM, Kevin Wong wikipedianmarlith@gmail.comwrote:
Well, I still hope the software behind wikipedia will remain free.
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 3:38 AM, Charlotte Webb charlottethewebb@gmail.comwrote:
On 11/20/08, K. Peachey p858snake@yahoo.com.au wrote:
Wikipedia set for video explosion?
As long as it's not a "fair use" explosion the glass windows won't break.
According to CNet <
http://news.cnet.com/8301-17939_109-10103177-2.html?tag=newsLatestHeadlinesA...
, this could include picture editing software and allow users to modify
images
and see past revisions in the same way as they can the text.
There is a proposal to add an edit box and a diff view for .svg files (which are stored in plain text) but it's been on the back burner for 2+1/2 years.
Obviously making bitmap/raster images editable and diffable in situ would be significantly harder (and less likely to have a constructive purpose) than doing so for svgs, so I'll believe it after I see it.
—C.W.
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
-- Whether you can or can't, any way you are correct. - Henry Ford _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l