On 5/18/07, Todd Allen toddmallen@gmail.com wrote:
On 5/18/07, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
On 18/05/07, Matthew Brown morven@gmail.com wrote:
True consistency would have every article on Wikipedia having a spoiler warning, just in case, and a half-dozen others as well.
Literally every page on Wikipedia has a link to [[Wikipedia:General disclaimer]], which links to [[Wikipedia:Content disclaimer]], which proclaims in big letters at the top:
WIKIPEDIA CONTAINS SPOILERS AND CONTENT YOU MAY FIND OBJECTIONABLE
- d.
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
And that's all we need. We don't have warnings to say "THIS ARTICLE CONTAINS ANATOMICALLY CORRECT IMAGES OF HUMAN GENITALIA", and we don't need any to say "THIS ARTICLE CONTAINS A SPOILER." If you go looking for information on a work of fiction -anywhere- besides sites which you clearly know avoid spoilers, you may get a faceful of spoiler. That's true whether it's Wikipedia, a forum, or anything else. Our job is not as a film-review or film-recommendation site, it is as an encyclopedia. And those discuss works of fiction in full without spoiler warnings.
-- Freedom is the right to say that 2+2=4. From this all else follows.
But we *do* discuss the stuff in full, just put a centimeter-tall warning at the top that you can turn off with your CSS. And also, on the images issue, I believe that [[autofellatio]] does not have the image on the page, but on a seperate one. (I may be wrong, that article *may* have the image on it, and is NOT AT ALL SAFE FOR WORK.)
~~~~