On 3/11/06, Delirium delirium@hackish.org wrote:
We're no longer talking about correcting errors in the interest of accuracy---we're talking about mollifying angry complaintants, preventing bad publicity for the foundation, and other such things that are not equivalent to writing a factually accurate encyclopedia.
Not wholly true, I believe. I don't think the intention is to permanently remove information that is accurate; rather, it's to remove possibly inaccurate info until it can be checked against sources, tightly worded, and made as correct as we can have it.
Yes, it IS a process different than the standard.
-Matt