Bryan Derksen wrote:
You've presented no additional evidence or reasoning in response to my question, just repeated yourself and bumped your estimate down another order of magnitude to one in a million. So now there's only been about _four registered editors_ in the history of Wikipedia who you think could be objective about themselves.
This is simply silly, and hardly worth debating any more. You're just throwing random numbers around.
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
As I stated-even if we accept that only 90% of people are incapable of writing neutrally about themselves, that's a pretty unreliable source. Would you cite a source in an article that's known to get it wrong 9 of 10 times?