Just thinking about it is enough to turn anybody insane! :o - White Cat
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 9:53 PM, Marc Riddell michaeldavid86@comcast.netwrote:
on 1/13/09 2:26 PM, White Cat at wikipedia.kawaii.neko@gmail.com wrote:
In general when a proposal achieves the state where it does not face
serious
opposition by the majority we consider that a "general agreement". In general votes are given a month or so to go on. It depends on how many
votes
are casted. The key problem is people are sick and tired of the deletionists-inclusionsist war. It has been going on for about 5 years now. A lot of people are "avoiding the drama" till the dust could settle.
None of this has a fixed rule by the way... So I do not really have an
easy
answer.
It may sound like I am rambling on without providing any answers which
would
accurately describe how I am right now. Full of questions without any
real
answers...
It sounds to me like you are trying to make sense out of some things, WC, and for that I congratulate you. And, answers or no answers, keeping asking the questions. One huge answer is better communication skills for all involved. It is achievable, if only a commitment would be made to achieve it.
Marc
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Marc Riddell michaeldavid86@comcast.netwrote:
on 1/13/09 8:36 AM, White Cat at wikipedia.kawaii.neko@gmail.com wrote:
When consensus is reached the relevant pages are updated accordingly.
In
general major changes (such as the one in discussion) is voted upon by
the
entire community. Not five or six editors but hundreds of editors. The voting happens after there is an agreement on the general principles -
even
if such an agreement is partial or temporary.
WC, how is it determined that this agreement has been reached?
During the vote people are given the option to support/oppose different approaches.
Is there a set time for the vote? And, if so, how is it set?
Marc
- White Cat
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Marc Riddell michaeldavid86@comcast.netwrote:
on 1/13/09 2:33 AM, White Cat at wikipedia.kawaii.neko@gmail.comwrote
:
In other words there is a lack of consensus. Meaning no mass action
of
any
kind should be taken until a consensus is secured.
On any given subject within the Project, how does someone go about achieving consensus? And how and when do you determine that a consensus has been reached?
Marc Riddell
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l