Wondering if it might be an idea to keep arbitrators at arms length
from all >but essential enforcement, and have the arbitrators who opposed a particular >penaly be the ones acting to enforce it, at least if the decision was close.
Actually it's been my experience that admins do the enforcing, not the arbitrators. Except in an emergency, I don't see any need for the arbitrators to enforce thier decisions. There has never been a case ( to my knowledge) where there aren't any admins willing to enforce an AC ruling, and i don't think there is any realistic chance of that happening in the future.
Theresa