On 7/20/08, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
2008/7/21 SlimVirgin slimvirgin@gmail.com:
David, you need to learn to disagree with people politely.
This is the latest place you've forum-shopped this vendetta to. Lar has been investigated from several directions in this affair, some instigated by you personally (when you sent Anthere to checkuser-l with information that turned out to be incomplete in many respects) and been cleared in all of them. So excuse me if I'm somewhat terse and want to get to the damn point.
Stop being so rude, please. It is not a "vendetta," and it has not been forum-shopped at all. I didn't write to Anthere about itl. I wrote to her to ask what we needed to do to have checkuser policy violations covered by the Ombudsman.
If that's the new rule, fine. Let's add it to the checkuser policy -- namely that no grounds whatsoever are needed for checks. But if we're not willing or able to change the policy, let's try to stick to it.
That's not what it says or means, and this has been said to you by several people and groups of people from several directions.
That's now what what says or means?
It's because checkusers take the view that they must defend other checkusers come what may, at least in public, that these misuses continue.
Or you could be wrong, of course.
But I'm not wrong. Just take a look at your own aggression.
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l