Be realistic - you can't get anything, be it major or minor, done on enwiki these days without heated debate. So many voices around that at least one will always raise itself in complaint.
CM
Odi profanum vulgus et arceo.
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 10:33:02 -0500 From: cdhowie@gmail.com To: wikien-l@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] So, has the need for consensus in wikipedia been eliminated?
On Jan 10, 2008 10:22 AM, Christiano Moreschi moreschiwikiman@hotmail.co.uk wrote:
Depends on how you define consensus, Chris. When it comes to closing an AfD I certainly consider 2:1 to be a fairly strong consensus one way or the other, though of course it's always the respective validity of the arguments that counts.
CM
Odi profanum vulgus et arceo.
I certainly do not define consensus as "ongoing heated debate over a controversial change."
-- Chris Howie http://www.chrishowie.com http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Crazycomputers _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
_________________________________________________________________ Get Hotmail on your mobile, text MSN to 63463! http://mobile.uk.msn.com/pc/mail.aspx