Tony Sidaway wrote:
Nicholas Knight said:
StarCraft http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/StarCraft
Good grief. Just out of curiousity I took a look at this one. He's been reverting out perfectly reasonable edits and calling them vandalism.
Also, have a look at his user page, especially his "Things NOT to do" speil:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Coolcat#Things_NOT_to_do:
Somebody needs to sit this guy down.
I think he's more reasonable that you might think at first sight. For instance he reverted someone's change today on "Kurdistan" but later reverted his own edit in favor of the version he had reverted "untill issue is resolved, see talk." http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kurdistan&curid=80777&acti... This looks to me like a newbie still findng his feet; he probably has the makings of a good editor, so let's not frighten him off.
I checked out [[Ataturk]], always a likely hotspot for edit wars, and his work there in trying to drag the two sides (those that say he was a murderous dictator and those that hold him in almost iconic status) towards a NPOV solution seems pretty good. A little abrasive perhaps, but we tend to put up with that.
NB StarCruft seems to have undergone some refactoring recently so perhaps maybe there was just a bit of a cockup rather than malice?