Well, most of our regular contributors are sysops, so can edit if we choose. I doubt protecting it was that wise.
Fred Bauder
http://wwww.internet-encyclopedia.org
From: Anthere anthere6@yahoo.com Reply-To: wikien-l@wikipedia.org Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 10:25:01 -0700 (PDT) To: wikien-l@wikipedia.org Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Contraversial edit war
--- Dante Alighieri dalighieri@digitalgrapefruit.com wrote:
At 08:13 PM 7/22/2003, you wrote:
There is an edit war in process at http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholicism. Could
someone please protect
it? Things have gotten way out of hand!
Unfortunately, I have taken
sides on the issue, so I must request that someone
else protect it. A
mediator that is not Christian would also be
appreciated.
-- Michael Becker
I've protected the page. I have no interest in getting involved in the dispute, so consider me a third party.
I am confused Dante.
I think that when I put the edit war header, that page was protected. Then why did Rmhermen edited it to remove the controversial content if it was protected ? And why did you need to protect it again ? Who removed the protection ??? Are the ones not included in the edit war authorized to edit it ? (I feel lost here...could not there be a log of protection/unprotection ?)
Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l