David Gerard wrote: "...success..."[!]
On Jul 21, 2005, at 5:08 PM, Erik Moeller wrote:
While I would love to agree with you
entirely...[there are] pages like
is largely an LDS description of anti-Mormon
activities. Some of the LDS pages could
come straight out of glossy brochures from Utah.
Peoples can become greatly occupied with historiologising their collective persecution. (Which is easy enough to designated as a general -ism with anti- in front of it.) For example 9/11 articles might just as easily be filed under "Category:Anti-Americanism," and written off as a "largely Western/American description of anti-Western/American activities" (Didnt certain people even set up a "memorial wiki"?)
So, whilst its generally rather easy (for objective[istical] people) to see when something's a bit one-sided, it can be difficult for experienced editors to promote basic NPOV policy in some areas. So its not that "its all too much hard work," its that WP should try to conceptually organize various types of NPOV debates and approach them more collectively. Say "N P O V c o m m i t t e e."
SV
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com