On 14/06/07, Bryan Derksen bryan.derksen@shaw.ca wrote:
James Farrar wrote:
On 14/06/07, Bryan Derksen bryan.derksen@shaw.ca wrote:
And naturally it's gone as a result of what looks to me like a rather messy process.
The 14th AfD just closed.
That says a lot. Why should the 14th AfD be any different from all the other AfDs?
And furthermore, the article's been around since September 2005 so that means on average it's gone up for AfD roughly every 1.3 months. Some sort of rate limit would be nice.
I agree. A four month moratorium following a "Keep", or two months after a "no consensus" seems plenty to me. Maybe 6 and 3 respectively.
The other change I'd really like to see to the AfD process is that, following a "Keep" result, there should be a presumption against deletion in further AfDs, with the preferred remedy (if remedy proves necessary) being restoration to the version of the article that was Kept. Otherwise, you get silly situations like this where people keep going and going until they eventually get the result they want.