On Dec 6, 2007 5:21 PM, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/12/2007, jayjg jayjg99@gmail.com wrote:
On Dec 6, 2007 5:13 PM, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/12/2007, jayjg jayjg99@gmail.com wrote:
On Dec 6, 2007 4:58 PM, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/12/2007, Guy Chapman aka JzG guy.chapman@spamcop.net wrote:
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 20:55:24 +0000, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
>> I know that Durova's sysop bit and public humiliation >> is not enough for some people, but perhaps they should learn to >> accept that it's all they are going to get.
>So every copy of the list archive has been destroyed?
The list is not archived.
Unless people keep their own archives which is hardly improbable.
Why would an archive be relevant?
Because archives have this tendency to become public sooner or latter either through error or deliberately. Mod forms on various discussion boards tend to confirm this pattern quite frequently.
If true, so what? Can you please try to make a coherent point, rather than the usual one or two-line non-sequiturs?
"but perhaps they should learn to accept that it's all they are going to get"
I'm prepared to wait. Eventually we will get usable data rather than prevarication.
What prevarication? People have straightforwardly stated that !!'s block was not co-ordinated on the cyberstalking list. What is unclear?