From http://www.thejidf.org/2008/08/cjcurrie-biased-wikipedia-editor.html
*We posted a picture of someone we thought was CJCurrie. We never cited the source of where we found the photo and we never mentioned the name of the person in it. *
So it is OK to breach the privacy of Wikipedia's editors by posting their alleged pictures (i.e. CJCurrie) on *my* website and accuse them for doing just the same!
No that is not OK. And of course, both sides of the conflict need to respect Wikipedia's rules. Wikipedia editors should refrain from disclosing the privacy of each other. Wikipedia editors should refrain stating the ridiculous "ya bad, meh good".
Fayssal F.
On Sun, 7 Sep 2008 13:54:44 +0100 "David Gerard" dgerard@gmail.com wrote: Subject: [WikiEN-l] More POV-pushing nutters To: "English Wikipedia" wikien-l@lists.wikimedia.org Message-ID: fbad4e140809070554y37e1d466ree9c884c6edb2ea9@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
<snips>
http://www.thejidf.org/2008/09/wikipedia-editors-snooping-email.html
9.07.2008 Wikipedia editors snooping email, invading privacy, making threats, etc.
We're keeping a very close eye on the discussion on the JIDF article page. We have corresponded with some top notch Wikipedia people "behind the scenes" who have advised us to not discuss anything via email unless fully encrypted and secure, due to unethical and possibly illegal activities of various Wikipedia editors. Seems like some of them are extremely determined (through their own unreliable and "original research") to discover everyone they think might be behind the scenes at the JIDF and to try to "out" their identity, etc.
We intend to to do everything in our power to defend and protect the people and things which are important to us. When we are hit, we hit back harder---with every resource at our disposal. We are fans and
supporters of disproportionate response.
<snips>