Cheney Shill wrote:
Anons should not be editing policy. As you point out, it contributes little (nothing that couldn't be done with a throw-away account) and just wastes admin time. And may even lead to the frustration that has been voiced on this list by admins quitting wiki. Utterly pointless.
I see it as pointless too, but sure not as much that someone should construe a wiki-quitting reason out of this.
It's just a waste of time to watch and revert these anon-policy changes. Yet another reason to remove these pages from one's own watchlist (another form of IAR ;-).
It serves more as a honey-pot for vandals, with ensuing potential collateral damage caused by IP blocks.
But it's probably not that important. I was just a bit astonished to see that we we cannot semi-protect the policy about semi-protection ;-)
--Ligulem