On 3/11/06, Michael Snow wikipedia@earthlink.net wrote:
geni wrote:
Without commenting on those particular references - Not all references are equal. Just >because somebody publishes a completely wrong and biased fact somewhere else does >not give us an OK to cite that information.
Depends who published it. [[Killian documents]] seems to exist.
Because the publication itself turned out to be notable, but their contents should not be cited as fact in Wikipedia. It's not pertinent to the issue that we can't republish libel and excuse it by citing the libel to another source.
We've been though this WP:OFFICE extends beyond pure legal issues.
-- geni