On 11/12/05, Delirium delirium@hackish.org wrote:
There's an informal (formal?) rule that if a majority of arbitrators ever recuse on a case, they all are automatically unrecused. The justification is that, in all probability, a situation that resulted in a user having personal conflicts with nearly every single arbitrator is more likely to be the fault of the user than the fault individually of every arbitrator. A more practical justification is that it serves as a deterrent to trying to "win" a case by forcing everyone to recuse.
-Mark
No. Last time we disscussed this the general conclusion was that we would call up past arbcom members and people from other languages if posible. The solution you list runs into the problem that if you have multiple sibjects to abitration it is posible for none of them to have gone overboard in dissputes.
-- geni