On Jan 12, 2004, at 1:38 PM, Nikola Smolenski wrote:
On Monday 12 January 2004 13:04, zero 0000 wrote:
I propose that for particularly problematic topics there are two versions. One is the "official version" which is write-protected. The official version is what readers get when they click on links. The other is the "draft version", which can be editted. Then there is some standard procedure (a committee?) by which the draft version can be copied to the official version.
I don't think that it should be done because I think that it could not be ensured that the committees assembled for that purpose will be neutral.
Er, then who *would* be neutral? Someone has to be, or we'll never get anywhere...
Peter
--- Funding for this program comes from Borders without Doctors: The Bookstore Chain That Sounds Like a Charity. --Harry Shearer, Le Show