Folks,
There is no potential tipping point that I can see for information being added to the system other than the capacity of the system to organise and retrieve information.
The reason I say this is that we see:
- at least one national, provincial or even municipal election held a week on average with new people being elected; - albums, movies and books being released each week; - musicians, actors, directors and authors becoming notable as a result of above regularly; - launch of notable new companies and businesses through IPOs and other processes; - a steady flow of scientific discoveries ; - notable national disasters occurring regularly (we have had two very significant ones occur within twelve months in the Indian Ocean tsunami and Hurricane Katrina); and - regular launch of notable new products.
The only potential limit is the capacity of the system to organise and retrieve such information.
Keith aka Capitalistroadster
On 9/21/05, Geoff Burling llywrch@agora.rdrop.com wrote:
On Tue, 20 Sep 2005, Tony Sidaway wrote:
A couple of days ago I was on the verge of taking this matter very seriously.
Then I looked at the net growth rate of the Wikipedia page count. Around 1500 new pages per day remaining undeleted after seven days. I compared
it
to the sclerotic maximum capacity of Articles for Deletion (AfD)
(average of
112 listings per day early June to early September) and the fact that
AfD
participants complain bitterly about their inability to keep up with AfD
at
present.
Tony's observation reminds me of a question I've pondered off & on over the last couple of months, which I'm adding to the mail list on the off chance someone may want to study it.
Simply put: is there a point in Wikipedia's size where it's current growth will taper off or stop? I don't mean to repeat the old chestnut that knowledge is somehow finite: put in different words, is there a certain point where contributors will find it far easier to work on existing articles than to contribute new ones?
(This is a problem that I doubt we'll encounter until Wikipedia reaches somewhere between 5 & 10 million articles, but I think it is a potential problem.)
Bottom line: AfD doesn't scale. Whatever problems may exist with AfD's tendency to randomly delete a selection of perfectly reasonable
articles,
and VFU's growing unwillingness to rectify this, the problem will
decrease
in significance in the long term as page creation rates accelerate inexorably beyond the reach of AfD, and possibly even any defensible extension of speedy deletion.
If there is such a tipping point, we may find that AfD (in whatever form it has at the time) not only will be able to keep up with the flow, but may actually reduce the size of Wikipedia!
Nevertheless, I admit Tony addresses a problem that will likely be seen far sooner than mine.
Geoff
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l