Richard Grevers wrote in part:
Some information is suppressed for the "public good".
Hmm ... who here believes that suppressing anatomical photographs of genitals is in fact in the "public good"? I guess LittleDan -- who else?
In fact the scope of information that is suppressed is one of the key determinants of whether we regard a particular political environment as being "free" or not.
I vote to keep Wikipedia "free". ^_^
-- Toby