On 1/12/06, Brock Batsell wikipedia@theskeptik.com wrote:
Wasn't this discussion aimed at the listings for "bad-quality" articles (i.e., salvageable, but when listed, in bad shape)?
No. It was my comment that started it, and my comment was that, in general, bad articles are more likely to be deleted than good ones. I don't think anyone in the debate will contest that.
-- Sam