Misuse doesnt get celebrated, no matter the nobility of its motive in the performance art world, by simply creating drama in its wake. Too abusable if so. (Article creation on a vandal if they manage to vandalize wp enough to get media comment, anyone?)
That sounds very much like applying special standards to protect us that nobody else gets. An incident involving someone causing trouble somewhere else will get an article in Wikipedia. We don't listen to complaints that the incident should go unreported because reporting it encourages people to cause trouble in other sites. Why, then, should we do this when it might encourage people to cause trouble in Wikipedia?