On 7/2/07, Fred Bauder fredbaud@waterwiki.info wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: Kamryn Matika [mailto:kamrynmatika@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, July 2, 2007 10:58 AM To: 'English Wikipedia' Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] FredBauder"clarifies"onattackkk site link policy
On 7/2/07, Fred Bauder fredbaud@waterwiki.info wrote:
I recall no arbitration ruling which relates to Wikipedia Review.
Fred
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
Why did you endorse my block if this is the case? The block was enacted solely on the ruling in the MONGO case and was applied to my reverting to
a
version of a page that contained a reference to Wikipedia Review. If
there
was no arbitration ruling that relates to Wikipedia Review, how is the justification for my block valid? Why did you support it?
I didn't read the link right. In this case the link might be fine, although Wikipedia Review is down right now. I don't support broad generalization of the MONGO case. Glad we cleared that up. Maybe we can resolve this. Who is it that thinks someone can be blocked for a link to Wikipedia Review based on the MONGO case?
Fred
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
Heh, okay... everyone makes mistakes.
See [ http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Essjay_controversy&diff=prev&a...] this edit I made, and my talk page [ http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KamrynMatika&oldid=1...] following it.
It seems that (in this case) ElinorD and Crum375 believe that it is OK to block an editor for adding a link to Wikipedia Review. In this case, the link pertained to the article as it linked to a thread on Wikipedia Review where Essjay's deception was first brought to light, and (in my opinion) it's quite relevant. I was warned for adding the link, based on the MONGO ruling, and then blocked when I ignored the warning (my bad there I guess). Is this or is this not appropriate? Thanks.