--- Mark Gallagher m.g.gallagher@student.canberra.edu.au wrote:
Well, folks and folkettes, we always have a long wait for these things, but it looks like we've finally found another violation of WP:POINT.
Since when does WP:POINT trump WP:NPOV? I will never apologise for "violating" POINT if its to make a stand for NPOV - particularly in light of a leadership vacuum wherin clear NPOV violations are by "consensus" allowed to stand.
For what it's worth, I do agree with you: [[Category:Anti-Semitic people]] a) does not appear to serve a useful purpose, b) is not exactly neutral, c) could well be described as a lawsuit waiting to happen, if applied improperly.
I disagree with the lawsuit paranoia, and dislike is usage as a crutch in arguments wherin a plain application of basic bonehead-level NPOV will suffice. Your agreement is noted, but is it counted?
You could do with being a little less strident about it, though. Your comment on that TfD wasn't going to change anyone's mind: it looks quite logical to someone who already agrees with you, but that's not as beneficial as you might think.
I dont know what else to say. Either we have a culture which respects NPOV or we do not.
Regards, SV
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com