Yes but also a canonical example of where they can't get the distributed computing effect since they are not allowed to edit from home for security reasons.
Quoting Nathan Awrich nawrich@gmail.com:
Depends on if the management culture promotes it to enough extent. The best example in my opinion has to be Intellipedia - an enormous volume of knowledge, harnessed to solve major problems of synthesis in a community with a huge but distributed pool of intellectual firepower.
On Dec 14, 2007 8:43 PM, joshua.zelinsky@yale.edu wrote:
Quoting Matthew Brown morven@gmail.com:
On Dec 14, 2007 4:03 PM, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
(I'm a *tremendous* fan of office wikis. Best idea ever IMO.)
I love them, but I also find it nigh-on impossible to fight the corporate need to CONTROL them in useless ways. They tend to want complicated permissions structures and stuff like that which end up ruining the wiki idea under a pile of red tape.
-Matt
There's another serious problem: public wikis work great because they harness to a large extent what would be procrastination time. In essence, Wikipedia is a [[distributed computing]] system using human brains as the substrate.{{or}}. People are less inclined to work on office wikis in their free time. So one is using up resources that would get used productively anyways. There might be other advantages but the primary advantage of open-wikis is substantially curtailed.
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l