Ben McIlwain wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Alphax (Wikipedia email) wrote:
Erik Moeller wrote:
.. and they're going to spam our e-mail queue: http://www.evolutionnews.org/2006/09/wikipedia_youre_on_notice.html
It would be nice to get some evolutionary biologists to review our entries on the respective topics systematically. I suspect there's probably a lot of creationist POV creep already.
It would also be nice to get some creationists to review our entries on Creatonism and Intelligent Design systematically; I suspect there's a lot of evolutionist POV creep.
It would also be nice to get some Ptolemaist scholars to review our entries on gravitation and the solar system systematically; I suspect there's a lot of Galilean POV creep.
Seriously though, legitimate POV disputes are one thing ... but when one side has all of the science behind it and the other side has nothing behind it, giving equal weight is fallacious. Our articles on the shape of the Earth, global warming, what caused 9/11, and HIV causing AIDS are similarly reality-based.
Ben McIlwain ("Cyde Weys")
I suspect his suggestion was review of what we say about them. A group so unpopular that they are characterized as they have been on this thread probably has some legitimate concerns about being misrepresented.
SKL