Yep! As I recall, the first use of a particular <ref> need not be the "real" one, anymore. It may be beneficial to start just using <ref name="foo"/> in the article text, and then shove the main refs to the bottom of the article, above or around the <refereces/> tag. For the time being, I suppose that would cause a few extra footnote links, but surely the problem is surmountable.
Thoughts?
On 12/9/06, stvrtg stvrtg@gmail.com wrote:
The apple
<ref name=foo> {{cite web |url=http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/389438794343.html |title=Foo panel disagress with bar |first=Foo |last=Bar |date=2006-10-17 |publisher=The Sunday Times |accessdate=October 17 |accessyear=2006}} </ref> is red.
Anyone else bothered by how much these clutter up and interefere with editing text?
-sv _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l