On 9/13/05, steve v vertigosteve@yahoo.com wrote:
In that sense, having Disambiguation sections might be a hindrance, but its at least more definitive and organized than hatnotes, which just obstruct from the article.
SV
By hatnotes, do you mean the notes at the top of pages that disambiguate? If so, I really see no problem with these, other then sometimes the primary disambiguation is set up stupid. (Imagine band called USA, and someone decided to give them primary disambiguation over the country...). I think a disambiguation section would be much worse. If there's more then one other thing the name could be, and the article has primary disambiguation, and *really* should have it, then there should be a link to the disambiguation on the top of the page.
I happen to like our current disambiguation setup.