And I disagree with your assessment. Non-righteous block, fraudulent claim of "vandalism only" account, edits had sources including sources brought from other articles on wikipedia that have not been challenged.
Parker
On 10/8/06, Guy Chapman aka JzG guy.chapman@spamcop.net wrote:
On Sat, 7 Oct 2006 18:50:40 -0500, "Parker Peters" onmywayoutster@gmail.com wrote:
The "original" account was claimed to be NoLongerScieno (blocked for "name..") and the second account was ScienoSitter. Possible sockpuppet? Certainly. Worthy of blocking under name block? Maybe. Wrongful to tag as a "vandalism only" account and wrongful to block for being a sockpuppet of a username block? Definitely.
I reviewed the edits of both accounts, 100% vandalism (POV-pushing). Righteous block. Next case, please.
Guy (JzG)
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l