On 5/8/07, doc doc.wikipedia@ntlworld.com wrote:
We choose admins for their good judgment and trustworthiness.
I agree, but the community has their own set of standards which is less relevant.
if we can't "take their word for it", when directly asked, then they should not be admins.
I agree, but if we are not able to know for sure until after somebody borrows their account to delete the main page (or put tubgirl on the site notice), it's a pointless question to ask.
Of course there will always be those who will have an uncrackable password but go insane and cause the same problems. This will be unpreventable, but hopefully less common.